![]() ![]() 90-95 (which would include, for example, any prior felony drug possession, sale, or PWISD-not just trafficking). He or she must not have previously been convicted of any felony under G.S. Several of the other conditions are directed at the defendant’s criminal history. So, less than 50 pounds of marijuana, less than 200 grams of cocaine, etc. Second, the trafficking must be for possession of an amount within the lowest category of trafficking for the particular controlled substance in question. First, the law applies only to defendants being sentenced solely for trafficking or conspiracy to traffic by possession trafficking by manufacture, delivery, and transport are not eligible. That new subdivision says the judge sentencing a defendant for drug trafficking or conspiracy to commit drug trafficking (which is sentenced the same as drug trafficking itself) may depart from the otherwise mandatory sentencing rules for trafficking if he or she makes a finding that the defendant meets 11 conditions.Īmong those conditions are two threshold requirements that substantially limit the law’s applicability. It amends the drug trafficking sentencing provisions in G.S. North Carolina’s enacted law is similar to the version I described back in January. ![]() ![]() (There’s no real connection between the two.) At that point we were already getting questions about how North Carolina’s proposed law related to an existing federal law of the same name. I wrote about it earlier in the year, here, when it was still under consideration in the General Assembly. 2020-47, is called the North Carolina First Step Act. A new law provides a limited possibility of sentencing and post-conviction relief for certain defendants convicted of drug trafficking. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |